
As we approach the end of the financial year, now is a good time to revisit your superannuation contributions before the window closes in the weeks prior to 30 June. Super is a long game, but most of the levers you can pull are pulled inside a tight 12-month window, and several of them are use-it-or-lose-it.
Below is a checklist of 10 strategies worth considering – there’s likely to be a couple that are relevant to your situation.
A quick reminder before we dive in: contributions need to be received by your fund and allocated to your account before 30 June, not just sent. I usually recommend making them by 20 June at the latest, to allow for processing time. And if you intend to claim a personal contribution as a tax deduction, you must lodge a Notice of Intent to Claim form with your fund and receive an acknowledgement before you lodge your tax return (or roll over your benefits, whichever comes first).
1. Concessional (pre-tax) contributions
Concessional contributions are made from pre-tax dollars and are taxed at 15% inside super (or 30% if you are caught by Division 293). For most Australians earning more than $45,000, this is materially lower than your marginal tax rate, so concessional contributions remain the most tax-effective way to grow super.
The annual cap is $30,000, which includes your employer’s compulsory 12% Superannuation Guarantee. The cap is shared, so if your employer is contributing $14,000 of SG, you only have $16,000 of headroom to top up via salary sacrifice or a personal deductible contribution. Don’t guess – check your last payslip or ask your payroll team to estimate what your contributions will total this financial year. The cap is assessed on a cash basis – i.e. when the fund actually receives the contribution and allocates it to your account. This can result in timing differences between financial years, so it’s also good practice to cross check these against your actual super fund transactions.
The benefit gets sharper as your income increases. Between roughly $135,000 and $190,000 of taxable income, the tax saving on every dollar contributed is 24%. Above $190,000 (but below $250,000 of adjusted taxable income), the saving is around 32% – the peak tax benefit. Even with Division 293 applying, you still save 17%.
I have written before that making additional concessional contributions is usually worthwhile, but the size of the benefit depends a lot on your stage of life and competing priorities.
The concessional contribution cap increases to $32,500 after 1 July 2026.
2. Catch-up (carry-forward) concessional contributions
This is the strategy most worth checking before 30 June. If your total super balance was below $500,000 on 30 June 2025, you can use any unused concessional cap from the previous five financial years on top of this year’s cap.
This check is worthwhile for two reasons:
- 2025/26 is the final year in which you can use any unused concessional cap from 2020/21, when the annual cap was $25,000. Importantly, the oldest unused cap is applied first. Therefore, if you do not use any remaining 2020/21 cap this financial year, you will lose the opportunity to use it in future years.
- If your balance is heading toward $500,000 in the next year or two, this could be your last realistic chance to bank that catch-up amount.
In theory, someone who has not contributed at all over the last five years could make a single concessional contribution of up to $167,500 in 2025/26 ($25,000 + $27,500 + $27,500 + $27,500 + $30,000 + $30,000). That is rare in practice, but it does happen – an example is a retiree under 67 who returned to part-time work and is selling an investment property and wants to reduce their CGT liability. The tax savings on a $167,500 deduction at the top marginal rate, less the 15% in the fund, is meaningful. This could also apply to self-employed taxpayers who have not contributed for several years.
You can check your available balance via myGov → ATO → Super → Carry forward concessional contributions.
3. Contribution splitting with your spouse
Contribution splitting is different to a spousal contribution (covered separately below). It involves transferring up to 85% of your concessional contributions from the previous financial year into your spouse’s super account.
You generally apply to your fund after 30 June to split last year’s contributions, but the strategic decision is best made now while you are reviewing the year’s contributions in any case.
The reasons to split are mostly long dated:
- To equalise balances between you and your spouse, which becomes more important under Division 296. Two balances of $2 million each are taxed very differently to one balance of $4 million and one of nil.
- To get more of your combined super into the tax-free retirement phase. Each person has their own transfer balance cap (currently $2 million), so equal balances mean a couple can ultimately move up to $4 million into pension phase between them.
- If your spouse is older, splitting can give the household earlier access to tax-free benefits.
- If you are at or over Age Pension age and your spouse is younger, money in your spouse’s accumulation account is not counted for Centrelink means testing.
4. Non-concessional (after-tax) contributions
Non-concessional contributions are after-tax dollars, so they don’t reduce your tax bill on the way in, but they also don’t attract the 15% contributions tax. Once inside super, earnings are taxed at 15% in accumulation and zero in pension, which is almost always lower than your marginal rate.
The annual cap is $120,000, available to anyone under 75 with a total super balance below $2 million on 30 June 2025.
If you haven’t triggered the bring-forward rule in the previous two years, and your total super balance was below $1.76 million on 30 June 2025, you can bring forward three years of caps and contribute up to $360,000 in one go. If your balance was between $1.76 million and $1.88 million, you can bring forward two years for $240,000.
You can also straddle two financial years by making contributions either side of 30 June. For example, an individual could make a non-concessional contribution of $120,000 in June 2026, using the 2025/26 annual cap. Then, in July 2026, they could trigger the bring-forward rule and contribute three years’ worth of non-concessional contributions in one amount. As the annual non-concessional cap increases to $130,000 from 1 July 2026, this would allow a further contribution of $390,000. In total, this strategy could allow an individual to move up to $510,000 into super across the two financial years.
One important trap to be aware of, is an excess concessional contribution that is later reclassified as a non-concessional contribution. This can inadvertently trigger the bring-forward rule. Therefore, if you think you may have exceeded your concessional contribution cap in the past couple of years, it is important to check this carefully with the ATO, your super fund and your accountant before making any large non-concessional contributions.
5. Government co-contribution
If your assessable income (broadly) will be below $47,488 this year and at least 10% comes from employment or business, the government will tip in 50 cents for every dollar of non-concessional contribution you make, up to a maximum of $500. Therefore, a $1,000 contribution gets a $500 co-contribution. The co-contribution phases out at an income of $62,488. You must be under 71.
This is the single best return on investment available in the super system. If a low-income earner in your household qualifies, do not miss it.
6. Downsizer contributions
If you are 55 or older and you (or your spouse) have owned your home for at least 10 years, you can contribute up to $300,000 ($600,000 for couples) to super from the sale proceeds, within 90 days of settlement.
The downsizer contribution sits outside the non-concessional cap, has no work test, and can be made even if your total super balance exceeds $2 million. You do not need to actually downsize; you simply need to sell a qualifying home.
For someone planning to downsize in the next few years, it may be worth considering whether to borrow funds to make non-concessional contributions now and then use the future sale proceeds to repay the loan and make downsizer contributions at that time.
For example, a couple could each borrow $120,000 and make non-concessional contributions before 30 June 2026. Then, after selling their home in the following financial year, they could each make a downsizer contribution, and potentially also use the three-year bring-forward rule for non-concessional contributions. Depending on their circumstances and contribution eligibility, this strategy could allow a couple to move over $1.6 million into super across the two financial years.
Another important consideration is whether you expect to make a downsizer contribution in the future, and whether that contribution is likely to push your total super balance above $2 million. If so, this financial year may be your last opportunity to make a non-concessional contribution.
7. Spousal contributions
If your spouse earns less than $37,000 and you contribute up to $3,000 of after-tax money into their super account, you receive an 18% tax offset – worth up to $540. The offset phases out as your spouse’s income rises to $40,000.
This is one of the easiest wins in the super system, particularly where one spouse has taken time out of paid work. Don’t confuse it with contribution splitting (Strategy 3); a spousal contribution is new money going in, splitting is moving existing concessional contributions across.
A few things to keep in mind. The contribution counts towards your spouse’s non-concessional cap, so make sure they have headroom. And if your spouse also has income below $47,488 and meets the 10% work-related income test, consider whether a separate $1,000 non-concessional contribution from them would also pull in the $500 government co-contribution. The two strategies can be used together – check with your super fund how to correctly classify these contributions.
8. Small business CGT cap contributions
If you are an eligible small business owner selling your business or an active business asset (such as a commercial property), you may be able to make a CGT cap contribution of up to $1.865 million (for 2025/26) into super, separate from the standard concessional and non-concessional caps. This is one of the most generous concessions in the tax system, but the eligibility criteria are complex and require careful tax advice well before any sale.
If you are heading toward a business sale, this should be on your radar 12 to 24 months out.
9. First Home Super Saver Scheme
If you are saving for your first home, the FHSS lets you make voluntary contributions of up to $15,000 per year and release up to $50,000 (plus deemed earnings) towards a deposit. The contributions are typically made as concessional (i.e. via salary sacrifice or a personal deductible contribution), so you get the same tax benefit as a regular concessional contribution.
The structural advantage is fairly obvious: you save the deposit at 15% tax instead of your marginal rate, which can lift your effective savings rate. The drawback is the slow build – the $15,000 annual cap means it takes years to fully use the scheme. If you are seriously planning a purchase in the next few years, getting started this financial year is probably worthwhile.
10. Commencing a pension and reviewing your transfer balance cap
If you are looking to start your first retirement-phase pension, the transfer balance cap currently sits at $2 million. From 1 July 2026, it will increase to $2.1 million. This is an important cap because it is a lifetime limit that is effectively set when you first start a retirement-phase pension.
Once you start a pension, you must withdraw a minimum amount each year. The minimum starts at 4% per annum for people aged 60 to 64, increases to 5% per annum from age 65 to 74, and continues to rise with age. However, there is no maximum – you can withdraw additional amounts, including lump sums.
If you do want to take a lump sum, it may be better to commute part of your pension balance back to accumulation phase and then withdraw the lump sum from your accumulation account, rather than withdrawing it directly from your pension account. The reason is that a commutation creates a debit against your lifetime transfer balance cap. In simple terms, it restores some of your available transfer balance cap space. That headroom matters in two scenarios:
- You receive future contributions you want to move to pension phase, for example a downsizer contribution, sale of an investment property or receiving an inheritance.
- Your spouse passes and you inherit their super. In that case, you may want to preserve as much flexibility as possible to either retain those funds in super, recontribute them into super, or commence a death benefit pension. However, your ability to do this will be subject to your own transfer balance cap. Therefore, preserving cap space can be valuable.
Campbell has written separately on the death benefit tax and the recontribution strategy, both of which interact with these rules. If you are over 60 and have a meaningful super balance, this is a planning area that is worth more looking into.
A note on contribution reserving (SMSF members)
If you have an SMSF and you are claiming a large concessional deduction this year (perhaps using catch-up contributions), there is a strategy called contribution reserving that allows you to effectively double up. Two $30,000 contributions are made in June, but only one is allocated to your member account this financial year, and the second is deferred and allocated by 28 July. Both deductions are claimed in the current year’s tax return.
The mechanics matter: the trustee must resolve to defer allocation, and a Request to Adjust Concessional Contributions form must be lodged with the ATO. Done incorrectly, the second contribution gets treated as an excess. It is technical and SMSF-specific, but if you are in an SMSF and the numbers warrant it, raise it with your accountant well before 30 June.
A note on Division 296
The additional 15% tax on earnings attributable to super balances above $3 million (and an additional 10% above $10 million) is now law and applies from 1 July 2026 (so for 2026/27 onwards). It is worth keeping in mind when planning contributions over the next few years, particularly if you and your spouse have unequal balances. I covered the legislated version of Division 296 in a separate blog earlier this year.
Putting it all together
Most of the strategies above are not new. What changes each year is the size of the caps, the thresholds, your tax position and where you sit relative to them. The mistake I see most often is not the wrong choice of strategy, it is missing the deadline or making a mistake with the administration.
A few practical points as we approach 30 June:
- Confirm your year-to-date concessional contributions before adding any more.
- Check your total super balance at 30 June 2025 against the relevant thresholds ($500,000 for catch-up, $1.76m / $1.88m / $2m for non-concessional).
- Make contributions by 20 June to allow processing time.
- Lodge your Notice of Intent to Claim a Tax Deduction immediately after making any personal deductible contribution – don’t leave it until tax time.
- If you are using contribution reserving in an SMSF, lodge the form with the ATO.
As always, this is general information only, and your circumstances will determine which strategies are appropriate for you. If you are unsure, this is exactly the time of year to have the conversation with your adviser – not in late June.

I’m trying to understand the impact of the new Division 296 tax on my SMSF strategy.
I’m currently 46 and actively investing in stocks within my SMSF. Based on current growth assumptions, my SMSF trading account could exceed $3 million within the next 3–4 years.
My understanding is that from 1 July 2026, there will be an additional 15% tax on earnings attributable to balances above $3 million (and an additional 15% above $10 million).
My questions are:
If my SMSF balance exceeds $3 million, does that mean capital gains from selling stocks will effectively be taxed at:
existing SMSF tax rates (10% CGT / 15% income tax), plus
an additional Division 296 tax?
Or is the additional 15% applied differently?
Is Division 296 applied only to contributions into super, or does it also apply to investment earnings (e.g. dividends) and realised capital gains when selling shares inside the SMSF?
If the portfolio grows significantly but I don’t sell shares, can unrealised gains still trigger Division 296 tax calculations?
Would appreciate clarification from anyone across the latest legislated rules and practical implications for long-term SMSF investors.
Hi Manish,
Division 296 is something I’m planning to cover in a podcast episode in the next few months.
Quick high-level: Division 296 is an additional 15% tax – on top of the fund’s normal 15% income / effective 10% CGT, assessed personally to you (although you can use super monies to pay for it if you wish) on the proportion of your superannuation earnings attributable to the part of your Total Super Balance above $3m. A further 10% (not 15%) applies above $10m. It only kicks in once your TSB crosses the threshold, and only on the proportion above it.
A few key points relevant to your questions:
It applies to earnings, not contributions.
Unrealised gains are not taxed.
“Earnings” is measured differently for Div 296 than for normal SMSF tax. SMSFs can make a one-off, irrevocable election to reset the cost base of all fund CGT assets to their market value at 30 June 2026 for Division 296 purposes only. This effectively excludes any gains built up before 1 July 2026 from future Div 296 calculations. It doesn’t change your normal CGT cost base inside the fund.
Give the complexity of this tax, I’d suggest you speak with your registered tax agent.
Cheers,
Stuart
Thanks Stuart, really appreciate the response — the cost-base reset election to 30 June 2026 market value is particularly useful to know about. Will raise that with my registered tax agent.
Looking forward to the Div 296 podcast episode. If there’s room, two follow-up questions I’d love to hear covered:
1. **Threshold for two-member SMSFs.** For an SMSF with two members (e.g. spouse and me as joint members), does Div 296 apply at $3m per member — i.e. an effective $6m threshold across the fund — or is it assessed in some other way? Curious whether equalising balances between spouses materially changes the Div 296 exposure.
2. **Delta capital: SMSF NCCs vs personal investment company.** For balances above the threshold, is there a case for directing additional capital into a personal investment company instead of continuing NCCs into SMSF? My rough logic: company tax is around 30%, broadly comparable to the SMSF post-Div-296 effective rate, but with no preservation lock-up so I keep liquidity flexibility before 60. Counter-argument I keep coming back to is the tax-free pension phase after 60, which tilts SMSF back ahead on a lifetime basis. Interested in how you think through that trade-off for high-balance accumulators.
Thanks again, looking forward to the episode.
Manish
Thanks, Manish. I’ll aim to cover them off.
Hi Stuart,
Can you please elaborate on “3. Contribution splitting with your spouse “? Where would you use this contribution splitting strategy, vs just putting additional concessional contributions in the spouses name to begin with? E.g. Husband earns 220k, wife earns 110k. Since the husband is on the 45% tax rate whilst the wife is on the 30% tax rate, would it make more sense for the husband to make additional concessional contributions to his own super and then do contribution splitting – rather than the wife just making additional contributions in her own name? Or have I misunderstood how this strategy works?
Can you give some real world examples of scenarios where it makes sense to pursue this option? Additionally how does one actually do this in the real world? I understand your super fund needs to support it. But lets say I’m with AMP for example whom supports it, and my wife is with another fund who doesn’t support it – will that still work if I’m the one wanting to contribution split with her? Or do we both need to be with the same fund?
I’m also particularly interested to know how it works in conjunction with, or perhaps alongside, the carry forward concessional contributions. I know you can do upto 85% of your concessional contributions so is that just 85% of the annual $30k cap? OR if there are unused carry forward concessions (let’s say last 5 FY’s had 10k of unused cap per year so a total of 50k unused carry forward cap) could you theoretically do 85% of this total ($80k)? And
I’ll paint a scenario for illustrative purposes, but acknowledge of course that your response does not constitute financial advise. For example, a 34 year old male is earning $260k+ which puts him over the Div 293 threshold. That level of income also of course means that the employer contributions basically cap out the concessional contribution limits. He has ~$250k in his super currently.
His wife is also 34 years old, earning $105k p.a. and only has ~$110k in her super. They currently have two kids aged 4 and 2 and another third on the way later this year. As such, the wife has clearly been on and off work the last few years and has a lot of carry forward unused cap.
The husband is essentially hitting his concessional contribution cap with just the employer contributions (based on income level), and he has been taking advantage of the five year carry forward rule where their income level was a lot weaker 5+ years ago. In this scenario, is it advantageous for this couple to start contribution splitting strategy, given the husband is the higher income earner and there is more upcoming maternity leave etc for the wife which will leave her super balance lagging behind.
For added background context – In this scenario, the family does have 1 investment property which is negatively geared (99% ownership to the highest income earner) and does not have any other investments outside super. They want to start investing into old fashion market cap weighted index funds (ETF’s) but for now have not yet taken the plunge. Thus putting money into super at least feels like they’re doing something with their money in terms of investing.
Hi Shadi,
The key point here is: contribution splitting is not a tax strategy.
The tax deduction always belongs to the person who makes the concessional contribution. That benefit is captured when the money goes into super. Splitting happens afterwards and only moves the after-tax super balance, up to 85% of the contribution, to the spouse.
Therefore, the right framework is not “should he contribute and split, or should she contribute?” It is:
1. Claim the deduction where it is most valuable, usually the higher-income spouse.
2. Then decide separately whether some of that balance should be split to the lower-balance spouse.
That means a higher earner can claim the deduction at their higher marginal tax rate, then split most of the after-tax contribution to their spouse. You can get both benefits.
The reason to equalise balances is long-term planning:
1. Division 296 is assessed per person, not per couple, so two $2.5 million balances are very different from one $5 million balance.
2. The Transfer Balance Cap is also per person, so a couple with even balances can get more into the tax-free pension phase over time.
3. There can also be other benefits if one spouse is older, closer to preservation age, or where Centrelink rules become relevant later.
Where spouses are a similar age, it often makes sense to equalise super balances as far as possible. Contribution splitting is one way to achieve this.
Mechanically, the contributing fund must support contribution splitting, because that is where the application is lodged. Your spouse’s fund generally just needs to accept the rollover, which most funds do. You usually apply after 30 June to split concessional contributions made in the previous financial year. The spouse receiving the split must generally be under preservation age, or between preservation age and 65 and not retired.
The 85% limit applies to concessional contributions actually made in that year. Carry-forward contributions can increase the amount that can be split because they allow a larger concessional contribution to be made. For example, if someone contributes $80,000 using their current cap plus carry-forward cap, then up to $68,000 may be splitable.
Regarding concessional contributions, in your scenario, the husband is the higher earner, so in principle his contributions deliver the better tax benefit. But if his Super Guarantee already uses his concessional cap, and he has little carry-forward cap left, there may not be much additional contribution capacity to work with.
The wife, on the other hand, appears to have unused carry-forward cap and a lower super balance. On a $105,000 income, deductible contributions in her own name may still produce a worthwhile tax saving, to the extent that her taxable income does not fall below $45,000 and directly build the balance that needs catching up.
The broader point is that for a couple in their mid-30s, once sensible concessional contributions have been made, I would be careful about locking too much extra money inside super. Super is tax-effective, but access is a long way off. With young children, possible income changes, housing decisions, school fees, career moves or business opportunities ahead, flexibility has real value.
So, in broad terms, I’d look at using the wife’s carry-forward cap to the extent it makes sense, and split the maximum allowable amount, usually 85%, of the husband’s eligible concessional contributions to her each year. That helps direct more super into the lower-balance spouse’s name, while still preserving the tax benefit of the husband’s contributions. Once sensible concessional contributions have been made, I’d then direct surplus cash flow into an outside-super investment portfolio. That gives you tax efficiency where it is available, improves balance equalisation, and preserves liquidity at a stage of life where optionality really matters.
This is general information only and does not take into account anyone’s personal circumstances, so it is not personal financial advice.
Regards,
Stuart
Hi Stuart,
I appreciate the prompt and very detailed response. Thank you very much.
Hoping one day I can get more formal, long term advise from you and the team.
Keep up all the amazing work you do.
Kind Regards,
Shadi
You’re most welcome. All the best.